Only the quality, i.e. social environment, physical appearance,
and mental abilities of a person determine they are from the actions of previous beings,
but now the actions of.
If you see other people suffering and you are able to help, you are
not focusing on their karmic past but on your karmic opportunity in
the present: Someday you may find yourself in the same situation that they are in now,
so is your reason to act in the way that would you want them to act towards you
when that day comes.
This isn't about lamentation.
In Buddhism, regeneration is part of the continuous process of change.
In fact, we are not reborn only at the moment of death, we are born and
reborn every moment.
However, the Bible was not about karma but about God's judgment.
The full biblical verse is: Do not be fooled, God is not mocked; for whoever he sows, he
will also reap.
- Galatians 6:7).
The concept of karma is nothing but a cunning attempt
to get the soul into the laws of physics and so the fans believe they depend on the guru
for their release.
Young Agers want to refer to karma as the law of personal responsibility
when in reality it's the opposite, a mechanism that allows one to behave as pleases, having
full awareness that in some future life date everything will be balanced and not fundamental
because the young Agers believe the law of karma could not function in full effect over
a single lifetime, suggest a long series of lives over which Soul's "souls" "work from
its bad karma.
The final result, allegedly, of this long evolutionary process is the realization
of God, the great illumination in which the soul eventually becomes a god.
Therefore, the metropolitan is being traded as a perfect
mechanism of self-control, so the disparities and imperfections in a person are gradually
diminished and eliminated.
This amazing philosophy is designed to ensure that no one makes a
serious effort towards their personal salvation since, as the New Agers claim, everyone is
saved from the beginning, so does anyone need a Savior?
Again, Lucifer achieves an important goal when he gets someone to accept her menacing
philosophy.
The New Age movement has tried several ways to trade reincarnation among
Christians.
Among them is a hypnotic recession, where the subject is placed in a situation
that looks innocent and is caused to remember episodes of his "previous lives".
This is an extremely clever trick since hypnosis,
by its nature, exposes the subject to demonic influences.
Therefore, the implantation of "memories" is easy.
Young Agers also wish to mention cases of children remembering their
past lives.
This is extremely sad since children are very subjective and able to accept all
sorts of myths and stories as part of their personal reality.
If they are members of a family with concealed carry, the child may
also be exposed to an uncertain spirit and implanted with "memories" based on a verifiable
fact.
It is worth noting that the great architect behind most of the New Era philosophies, Mrs.
Blavatsky did not support the principle of reincarnation in her first major project,
Isis Unveiled.
If the fact of reincarnation is such a central doctrine of New Age thought,
then why was it not once mentioned in the monumental volume (over 1470 pages)?
The reason is simple - it has not yet been defined (in
1877) as important the piece of toxic Friday that Lucifer is preparing about the carelessness.
If you have any doubt about Blavatsky's obedience to Lucifer's sovereignty, that the name she
gave to her theosophical magazine was Lucifer and that the publishing house founded by her
students to spread her works was called beginning Lucifer Publishing Company (which was later
named to Lucis Trust).
Her books, Isis Unveiled, and the secret teaching are filled with Luciferian
philosophy.
Remove the ancient landmark, which your fathers have set.
People foolishly think they can feed on certain New Era beliefs,
coexisting with their Christian faith, but that's not possible.
As the Bible says, "Is a fountain coming to send to the same place
sweet and bitter water?"
(James 3:11).
If one move is Luciferian in each particular,
it is Luciferian all the way
No comments:
Post a Comment